Are the anterior negativities to grammatical violations indexing working memory?

Anterior negativities obtained when a grammatical rule is violated may reflect highly automatic first-pass parsing processes, the detection of a morphosyntactic mismatch, and/or the inability to assign the incoming word to the current phrase structure. However, for some theorists these negativities rather reflect some aspect of working memory processes. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) obtained for word category and morphosyntactic violations were directly compared with effects obtained when working memory is particularly demanded (embedding subject- or object-relative clauses), yielding a significant dissociation in terms of topography. Even though, the anterior negativities for grammatical violations vanished when relative clauses were embedded, suggesting that the processes reflected by anterior negativities related to grammatical violations and those related to working memory manipulations, even if different, are placing demands on a common pool of limited resources.

Studying semantics in the brain: the rapid stream stimulation paradigm.

Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide information about the temporal course of cognitive processes in the brain. They have proved to be a valuable tool in order to explore semantic aspects of word processing. However, to date, research in this field has been mostly concerned with the study of post-lexical features by means of the N400-paradigm. We introduce here the rapid stream stimulation paradigm, in which stimuli reflecting different levels of linguistic information are presented to subjects at a high rate of stimulation. The present protocol shows in detail how this paradigm can be applied. The application of the rapid stream stimulation paradigm evokes the recognition potential (RP), an ERP component that peaks at around 260 ms after stimuli onset and seems to be reflecting lexical selection processes. Results of studies that revealed the sensibility of the RP to visual-semantic aspects and the location of its neural generators within basal extrastriate areas are reported. Although some research has been conducted with the rapid stream stimulation paradigm much remains still to be done. Some of the possibilities that this paradigm offers are further discussed.

Electrophysiological evidence of a semantic system commonly accessed by animals and tools categories.

Some theoretical perspectives propose a semantic system in which categories are represented in different brain regions. Others assume that distinctions are based rather on differences in the demands placed by different categories on shared processing systems. In this study semantic categorization processes were investigated using the recognition potential (RP), an event-related brain response that reflects semantic processing, peaks at around 250 ms after stimulus onset and originates in areas subserving perceptual-semantic analyses. Results indicate that the RP shows some degree of sensitivity to categorization processes, but that categories assumed to differ markedly in their processing demands share, to a large extent, a common neural generator. This provides support for the non-categorical view on the organization of the semantic system, though introducing subtle variations, and suggesting the existence of a semantic subsystem specializing in the processing of perceptual-semantic features regardless of the semantic category involved.

Functional differences in the semantic processing of concrete and abstract words.

There is considerable debate as to whether the semantic system is a unitary one in which meanings are available in a peculiar, perceptual-free format, or whether it is functionally segregated into anatomically discrete, modality-specific but semantic regions. In the former case, concrete and abstract words should not differ in the amount of activation of semantic areas. Neuroimaging studies in this field are, however, far from conclusive, and one reason for this may be that the degree of imageability of the stimuli - probably a crucial variable - has not been considered. Recognition Potential (RP) reflects semantic processing and appears to originate in basal extrastriate regions involved in semantic processing. In this study, we compared the RP of concrete and abstract words that actually differ in their degree of imageability. Results indicate that the semantic processing areas in which the RP originates display a higher activation for concrete (more imageable) material, but that abstract material also evokes a notably larger RP component compared with pseudowords or unpronounceable letter strings. Accordingly, the study appears to suggest that there is no full functional segregation of the semantic systems. Rather, our data support the existence of a semantic system that is specialised in concrete, imageable material, and that is also activated, though to a lower extent, by abstract material.

Semantic processing of open- and closed-class words: an event-related potentials study.

Previous research on open- and closed-class words has revealed the existence of several differences in the processing of these types of vocabulary. In this paper the processing of open- and closed-class words was compared by means of an early electrical brain response, recognition potential (RP), which indexes semantic processing and originates from basal extrastriate areas. The effects of word frequency on closed-class words were also investigated. For these purposes, open- and closed-class words, among other stimuli, were presented by means of the rapid stream stimulation procedure. Results showed that there were no significant differences when comparing the RP evoked by open- and closed-class words in the left hemisphere. However, in the right hemisphere this situation changed: the RP evoked by open- and closed-class words did differ. Moreover, there were no differences between the RP evoked by closed-class words and pseudowords. These patterns of results suggest that the semantic processing of closed-class words shares some aspects with the processing of open-class words, despite the existence of some differences. Thus, whereas the semantic processing of open-class words recruits brain areas of both hemispheres, the semantic processing of closed-class words is left-lateralized. A second purpose of this work is to study word-frequency effects on closed-class words. Our results show the insensitivity of closed-class words to word-frequency effects.